Vol. 6, Issue 2, Part B (2024)

The purpose of this review is to compare the effects of water-based and land-based plyometric training on various physiological variables, including Vital Capacity, aerobic capacity (VO2 max), and body composition. This review synthesizes findings from studies examining the impact of water-based and land-based plyometric exercises on physiological markers. For this study total 30 male athletes were selected as subjects, 10 for each group (land based plyometric training, water based plyometric training and control group). The subjects were randomly selected having age ranged 18 to 25 years. The dependentsample t-tests were used to identify any significant differences between the groups at the pre and post-testsfor the dependent variables. Two-way mixed analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffes’ post hoc testing were used to determine significant differences. Both types of plyometric training effectively improve Vital capacity and aerobic capacity. Land-based plyometrics are generally more intense, leading to quicker improvements in VO2 max. The explosive nature of land-based exercises increases oxygen consumption and accelerates metabolic rate, contributing to faster adaptations in aerobic capacity. In contrast, water-based plyometrics, though slightly less intense, offer the advantage of reduced joint impact, making them suitable for individuals with injuries or those requiring lower-intensity training. Water's resistance also provides a unique challenge to muscle groups, contributing to muscle toning, fat loss, and cardiovascular endurance. Both water-based and land-based plyometric training are effective for enhancing physiological variables such as cardiovascular fitness, muscle power, and VO2 max. Land-based plyometrics tend to lead to quicker and more pronounced improvements in aerobic capacity and strength due to their higher intensity, while water-based plyometrics offer a safer, lower-impact alternative that still provides substantial benefits for cardiovascular fitness, muscle endurance, and fat reduction. The choice between the two should depend on individual needs, fitness goals, and injury considerations. Combining both methods can provide a comprehensive training regimen to enhance overall fitness and health.